We are using a single process with multiple threads, will look at client side delays.


On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Tyler Hobbs <tyler@datastax.com> wrote:
If I had to guess, I would say that your client is the bottleneck, not the cluster.  Are you inserting data with multiple threads or processes?

On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Anand Somani <meatforums@gmail.com> wrote:

I am running some tests trying to scale out our application from using a 3 node cluster to 6 node cluster. The thing I observed is that when using a 3 node cluster I was able to handle abt 41 req/second, so I added 3 more nodes thinking it should close to double, but instead it only goes upto bat 47 req/second!! I am doing something wrong and it is not obvious, so wanted some help in what stats could/should I monitor to tell me things like if a node has more requests or if the load distribution is not random enough?

Note I am using direct thrift (old code base) and cassandra 1.1.6. The data model is for storing blobs (split across columns) and has around 6 CF, RF=3 and all operations are at quorum. Also at the end of the run nodetool ring reports the same data size.


Tyler Hobbs