Interesting, almost pause-less?

Do you have any stats on GC frequency and time?

What settings?

 

With Oracle we can achieve ParNewGC pauses within 100-200ms once in 3-5 sec. Lower pauses (like within 50-100ms) could be achieved with greater frequency, but that makes worse results from client standpoint and throughput.

 

 

Best regards / Pagarbiai
Viktor Jevdokimov
Senior Developer

Phone: +370 5 212 3063, Fax +370 5 261 0453
J. Jasinskio 16C, LT-01112 Vilnius, Lithuania
Follow us on Twitter: @adforminsider
Take a ride with Adform's Rich Media Suite

Disclaimer: The information contained in this message and attachments is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee and may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are reminded that the information remains the property of the sender. You must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and irrevocably delete this message and any copies.

From: Shahryar Sedghi [mailto:shsedghi@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2013 19:13
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why do Datastax docs recommend Java 6? [heur]

 

I use IBM JVM 7, it is free,  and for VMs over 8 GB it has a garbage collection policy that makes it almost pause-less. We also use some security libraries that eliminates use of other libs that you need for Oracle.

 

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com> wrote:

Hey guys. what gives!
Apparently Cassandra ran on 1.7 like 5 years ago. Was their a regression?

jk

https://github.com/jbellis/helenus

Installation
------------
* Please use jdk 1.7; Cassandra will run with 1.6 but 
  frequently core dumps on quad-core machines
* Unpack the tar ball:

 

 

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Wei Zhu <wz1975@yahoo.com> wrote:

Anyone has first hand experience with Zing JVM which is claimed to be pauseless? How do they charge, per CPU?

 

Thanks

-Wei


From: Edward Capriolo <edlinuxguru@gmail.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, February 6, 2013 7:07 AM
Subject: Re: Why do Datastax docs recommend Java 6?

 

Oracle already did this once, It was called jrockit :)

 

Typically oracle acquires they technology and then the bits are merged with the standard JVM. 

 

On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 2:13 AM, Viktor Jevdokimov <Viktor.Jevdokimov@adform.com> wrote:

I would prefer Oracle to own an Azul’s Zing JVM over any other (GC) to provide it for free for anyone :)

 

Best regards / Pagarbiai

Viktor Jevdokimov

Senior Developer

 

Phone: +370 5 212 3063, Fax +370 5 261 0453

J. Jasinskio 16C, LT-01112 Vilnius, Lithuania

Follow us on Twitter: @adforminsider

Take a ride with Adform's Rich Media Suite

Adform News

Adform awarded the Best Employer 2012


Disclaimer: The information contained in this message and attachments is intended solely for the attention and use of the named addressee and may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are reminded that the information remains the property of the sender. You must not use, disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this e-mail. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender immediately and irrevocably delete this message and any copies.

 

From: jeffpk@gmail.com [mailto:jeffpk@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 02:23
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why do Datastax docs recommend Java 6?

 

Oracle now owns the sun hotspot team, which is inarguably the highest powered java vm team in the world. Its still really the epicenter of all java vm development.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry


From: "Ilya Grebnov" <ilya@metricshub.com>

Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 14:09:33 -0800

Subject: RE: Why do Datastax docs recommend Java 6?

 

Also, what is particular reason to use Oracle JDK over Open JDK? Sorry, I could not find this information online.

 

Thanks,

Ilya

From: Michael Kjellman [mailto:mkjellman@barracuda.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2013 7:29 AM
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: Re: Why do Datastax docs recommend Java 6?

 

There have been tons of threads/convos on this.

 

In the early days of Java 7 it was pretty unstable and there was pretty much no convincing reason to use Java 7 over Java 6.

 

Now that Java 7 has stabilized and Java 6 is EOL it's a reasonable decision to use Java 7 and we do it in production with no issues to speak of.

 

That being said there was one potential situation we've seen as a community where bootstrapping new node was using 3x more CPU and getting significantly less throughput. However, reproducing this consistently never happened AFAIK.

 

I think until more people use Java 7 in production and prove it doesn't cause any additional bugs/performance issues Datastax will update their docs. Until now I'd say it's a safe bet to use Java 7 with Vanilla C* 1.2.1. I hope this helps!

 

Best,

Michael

 

From: Baron Schwartz <baron@xaprb.com>
Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Date: Tuesday, February 5, 2013 7:21 AM
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Subject: Why do Datastax docs recommend Java 6?

 

The Datastax docs repeatedly say (e.g. http://www.datastax.com/docs/1.2/install/install_jre) that Java 7 is not recommended, but they don't say why. It would be helpful to know this. Does anyone know?

 

The same documentation is referenced from the Cassandra wiki, for example, http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/GettingStarted

 

- Baron

 

 

 




--
"Life is what happens while you are making other plans." ~ John Lennon