Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1718BF467 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:18:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30324 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2013 16:17:39 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 30288 invoked by uid 500); 22 Mar 2013 16:17:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 30251 invoked by uid 99); 22 Mar 2013 16:17:39 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:17:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [192.174.58.134] (HELO XEDGEA.nrel.gov) (192.174.58.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 16:17:33 +0000 Received: from XHUBA.nrel.gov (10.20.4.58) by XEDGEA.nrel.gov (192.174.58.134) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.245.1; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:17:07 -0600 Received: from MAILBOX2.nrel.gov ([fe80::19a0:6c19:6421:12f]) by XHUBA.nrel.gov ([::1]) with mapi; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:17:10 -0600 From: "Hiller, Dean" To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 10:17:16 -0600 Subject: index_interval file size is the same after modifying 128 to 512? Thread-Topic: index_interval file size is the same after modifying 128 to 512? Thread-Index: Ac4nGLRlpXtjVeHkR+yA7XEQrh22Lw== Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I was just curious. Our RAM has significantly reduced but the *Index.db fi= les are the same size size as before. Any ideas why this would be the case? Basically, Why is our disk size not reduced since RAM is way lower? We are= running strong now with 512 index_interval for past 2-3 days and RAM never= looked better. We were pushing 10G before and now we are 2G slowing incre= asing to 8G before gc compacts the long lived stuff which goes back down to= 2G again=85..very pleased with LCS in our system!!!!! Thanks, Dean