Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D3BAD7BA for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 20001 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2013 16:16:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 19938 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2013 16:16:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 19915 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2013 16:16:50 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:16:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of edlinuxguru@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-wi0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 16:16:44 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id ez12so1366074wid.5 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:16:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MvkM1cQclOpj5177UDAmflM0NwN+UpnEIPlCQIswI+U=; b=bjMZOflhYU7D32l7CdeYg3Gu7J4DtRmO1EDBsrugtXhiTxcyt0/uW9ggYysGOBaigf YiFwajb+7DaTFEps6UsI2FzJaAoCxd9/oLmewyL2UqlXLjBtxivw5M7gIkrsAtMtpyAm TZxS3DWJqngSnvCHr6uSkJBmbjmQts12v9fRskrsTYSpMaKebXXYPgd6ohgD7KpidNjG Ek3mCmdRvuFkaRrQTzSDMXPCJYVUwdRCEL3iFK+Ci883ss1e9Fa0iPX+NXfnksqIGMtX 7S5mXfCNSa39OHdFmeo38vYZ1Y8iTCWSgwK6Cz0FMmz9jDhXpNmBxFSQ+FD3y+gleOy5 PQnw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.174.196 with SMTP id bu4mr5370456wjc.35.1360944983848; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:16:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.61.137 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Feb 2013 08:16:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2013 11:16:23 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: heap usage From: Edward Capriolo To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It is not going to be true for long that LCS does not require bloom filters. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-5029 Apparently, without bloom filters there are issues. On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 7:29 AM, Blake Manders wrote: > > You probably want to look at your bloom filters. Be forewarned though, > they're difficult to change; changes to bloom filter settings only apply to > new SSTables, so they might not be noticeable until a few compactions have > taken place. > > If that is your issue, and your usage model fits it, a good alternative to > the slow propagation of higher miss rates is to switch to LCS (which doesn't > use bloom filters), which won't require you to make the jump to 1.2. > > > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:06 AM, Reik Schatz wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> recently we are hitting some OOM: Java heap space, so I was investigating >> how the heap is used in Cassandra 1.2+ >> >> We use the calculated 4G heap. Our cluster is 6 nodes, around 750 GB data >> and a replication factor of 3. Row cache is disabled. All key cache and >> memtable settings are left at default. >> >> Is the primary key index kept in heap memory? We have a bunch of keyspaces >> and column families. >> >> Thanks, >> Rik > > > > > -- > > Blake Manders | CTO > > Cross Pixel, Inc. | 494 8th Ave, Penthouse | NYC 10001 > > Website: crosspixel.net > Twitter: twitter.com/CrossPix