"routing more traffic to it?"
So shouldn't I see more "network in" on that node in the AWS console ?
It seems that each node is recieving and sending an equal amount of data.
What value should I use for dynamic-snitch-badness-threshold to give it a try ?Le 20 déc. 2012 00:37, "Bryan Talbot" <email@example.com> a écrit :Oh, you're on ec2. Maybe the dynamic snitch is detecting that one node is performing better than the others so is routing more traffic to it?-BryanOn Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Alain RODRIGUEZ <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
@Aaron"Is there a sustained difference or did it settle back ? "Sustained, clearly. During the day all nodes read at about 6MB/s while this one reads at 30-40 MB/s. At night while other reads 2MB/s the "broken" nodes reads at 8-10MB/s
"Could this have been compaction or repair or upgrade tables working ? "Was my first thought but definitely no. this occurs continuously."Do the read / write counts available in nodetool cfstats show anything different ? "The cfstats shows different counts (a lot less reads/writes for the "bad" node) but they didn't join the ring at the same time. I join you the cfstats just in case it could help somehow.Node 38: http://pastebin.com/ViS1MR8d (bad one)Node 32: http://pastebin.com/MrSTHH9FNode 154: http://pastebin.com/7p0Usvwd@Bryan
"clients always connect to that server"
I didn't join it in the screenshot from AWS console, but AWS report an (almost) equal network within the nodes (same for output and cpu). The cpu load is a lot higher in the broken node as shown by the OpsCenter, but that's due to the high iowait...)--
Bryan TalbotArchitect / Platform team lead, Aeria Games and EntertainmentSilicon Valley | Berlin | Tokyo | Sao Paulo