incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edward Capriolo <edlinuxg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: removing SSTABLEs
Date Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:01:21 GMT
Because you did a major compaction that table is larger then all the
rest. So it will never go away until you have 3 other tables about
that size or you run major compaction again.

You should vote on the ticket:

https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-4766

On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jason Wee <peichieh@gmail.com> wrote:
> The existence of sstable X will give an impact to the system or cluster?
> when the compaction threshold is reach, the sstable x and sstable y will be
> compacted. it's more like the system responsibility than human intervention.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:09 PM, B. Todd Burruss <btoddb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> if i stop a node and remove an SSTABLE, let's call it X, is that safe?
>>
>> ok, more info.  i know that the data in SSTABLE X has been tombstoned
>> but the tomstones are in SSTABLE Y.  i want to simply delete X and get
>> rid of the data.
>>
>> how do i know this .. i did a major compaction a while back and the
>> SSTABLE is so large it has not yet been compacted.  we "delete" data
>> daily and only keep 7 days of data.  the SSTABLE is almost 30 days
>> old.
>>
>> whattayathink?
>
>

Mime
View raw message