Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 17405DD19 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71484 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2012 15:04:25 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 70616 invoked by uid 500); 16 Oct 2012 15:04:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 70603 invoked by uid 99); 16 Oct 2012 15:04:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:04:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tyler@datastax.com designates 209.85.212.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.44] (HELO mail-vb0-f44.google.com) (209.85.212.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 15:04:17 +0000 Received: by mail-vb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fc26so7380149vbb.31 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:03:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Kda8GDQeiT4cLi7MT18DCxpLEbyAc8o+iDigavXvFC8=; b=UDYgpSnppAdIYTcAHlSLYtcn0/5nA+y84WmlbBvj/CRYJWcaZyVwtSYSQYuTjsEyvG wzGZc/QIyiKMiSpQEg0vU9xSt+TYKM4mVYNomiUx9jnfflvYYlFYWifl/ffY54Bsa1N+ 3WOpa5zWXaf9yRLJ780+n2yAogvjIQ3nlH2aw1Ea9WNd+sc0qlDHa+KftZ8PTUGoo7gK xAtAf9q2HquR872kyZlcx8w6lg7n7UfyyPcqMdTAY6rADKKtc1X7wv1NbNJPexrO4RmR SEJZs7FRKXL7/oWMw2Vuw3V/a7H2y5AwaLjFLEsQrVPNGACT4PmVDzTKtj+xHAj2a8y2 wuOA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.208.210 with SMTP id gd18mr8761975vcb.43.1350399836719; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:03:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.226.228 with HTTP; Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:03:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2012 10:03:56 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: what happens while node is bootstrapping? From: Tyler Hobbs To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec54fafae92890804cc2e7673 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkVShjvk0OaMOr/uf3a9O/APsoRerOhUIqjVnDM6/DmzwbMAo2eq7Nts74fHavnHYGZEgpV X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec54fafae92890804cc2e7673 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Andrey Ilinykh wrote: > Does it mean that during bootstrapping process only replicas serve > read requests for new node range? In other words, replication factor > is RF-1? > No. The bootstrapping node will writes for its new range while bootstrapping as consistency optimization (more or less), but does not contribute to the replication factor or consistency level; all of the original replicas for that range still receive writes, serve reads, and are the nodes that count for consistency level. Basically, the bootstrapping node has no effect on the existing replicas in terms of RF or CL until the bootstrap completes. -- Tyler Hobbs DataStax --bcaec54fafae92890804cc2e7673 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Andrey Ilinykh = <ailinykh@gmail.com> wrote:
Does it mean that during bootstrapping process only replic= as serve
read requests for new node range? In other words, replication factor
is RF-1?

No.=A0 The bootstrapping node will wri= tes for its new range while bootstrapping as consistency optimization (more= or less), but does not contribute to the replication factor or consistency= level; all of the original replicas for that range still receive writes, s= erve reads, and are the nodes that count for consistency level.=A0 Basicall= y, the bootstrapping node has no effect on the existing replicas in terms o= f RF or CL until the bootstrap completes.

--
Tyler Hobbs
DataStax
<= br> --bcaec54fafae92890804cc2e7673--