incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain HARDOUIN <romain.hardo...@urssaf.fr>
Subject Re: what is more important (RAM vs Cores)
Date Fri, 12 Oct 2012 08:57:50 GMT
Hi,

Sure it depends... but IMHO 6 GB is suboptimal for big data because it 
means 1,5 GB or  2 GB for Cassandra.
Maybe you could elaborate your use case. You really want a one node 
cluster ?

cheers,
Romain

wang liang <wlahhn@gmail.com> a écrit sur 12/10/2012 10:36:15 :

> Hi, Hagos,
> 
> I think it depends on your business case. Big RAM reduce latency and
> improve responsibility, High number of cores increase concurrency of
> your app. thanks.

> On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Hagos, A.S. <A.S.Hagos@tue.nl> wrote:
> Hi All,
> For of my projects I want to buy a machine to host Casssandra database.
> The options I am offered are machines with 16GB RAM with Quad-Core 
> processor and 6GB RAM with Hexa-Core processor.
> Which one do you recommend, big RAM or  high number of cores?
> 
> greetings
> Ambes
> 

> 
> -- 
> Best wishes,
> Helping others is to help myself.
Mime
View raw message