incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rob Coli <rc...@palominodb.com>
Subject Re: any ways to have compaction use less disk space?
Date Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:43:23 GMT
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Sylvain Lebresne <sylvain@datastax.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Rob Coli <rcoli@palominodb.com> wrote:
>> 150,000 sstables seem highly unlikely to be performant. As a simple
>> example of why, on the read path the bloom filter for every sstable
>> must be consulted...
>
> Unfortunately that's a bad example since that's not true.

You learn something new every day. Thanks for the clarification.

I reduce my claim to "a huge number of SSTables are unlikely to be
performant". :)

=Rob

-- 
=Robert Coli
AIM&GTALK - rcoli@palominodb.com
YAHOO - rcoli.palominob
SKYPE - rcoli_palominodb

Mime
View raw message