incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From aaron morton <aa...@thelastpickle.com>
Subject Re: Order of the cyclic group of hashed partitioners
Date Tue, 28 Aug 2012 04:57:30 GMT
Sorry I don't understand your question. 

Can you explain it a bit more or maybe someone else knows.

Cheers

-----------------
Aaron Morton
Freelance Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com

On 27/08/2012, at 7:16 PM, Romain HARDOUIN <romain.hardouin@urssaf.fr> wrote:

> 
> Thank you Aaron. 
> This limit was pushed down in RandomPartitioner but the question still exists... 
> 
>   
> aaron morton <aaron@thelastpickle.com> a écrit sur 26/08/2012 23:35:50 :
> 
> > > AbstractHashedPartitioner 
> > does not exist in the trunk. 
> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=cassandra.git;
> > a=commitdiff;h=a89ef1ffd4cd2ee39a2751f37044dba3015d72f1
> > 
> > 
> > Cheers
> > 
> > -----------------
> > Aaron Morton
> > Freelance Developer
> > @aaronmorton
> > http://www.thelastpickle.com
> > 
> > On 24/08/2012, at 10:51 PM, Romain HARDOUIN <romain.hardouin@urssaf.fr> wrote:
> > 
> > > 
> > > Hi, 
> > > 
> > > AbstractHashedPartitioner defines a maximum of 2**127 hence an 
> > order of (2**127)+1. 
> > > I'd say that tokens of such partitioners are intented to be 
> > distributed in Z/(127), hence a maximum of (2**127)-1. 
> > > Could there be a mix up between maximum and order? 
> > > This is a detail but could someone confirm/invalidate? 
> > > 
> > > Regards, 
> > > 
> > > Romain
> > 


Mime
View raw message