Return-Path: 
 <user-return-27344-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2E16CCF80
	for <apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Mon,  2 Jul 2012 14:35:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 11517 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2012 14:35:03 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11494 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2012 14:35:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 11467 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2012 14:35:02 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:35:02 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of leimy2k@gmail.com designates
 209.85.160.172 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.160.172] (HELO mail-gh0-f172.google.com)
 (209.85.160.172)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:34:55 +0000
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so4639000ghb.31
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=KSaSqpCNPNBPxyko7yNgpEKmFwVNRtQa4/iPwNHPwS8=;
        b=uCLlilGfmSja9ymcs39CTXfWkHRodXU5avZXuzi+3HSqx5FQVZcF4QWyQSitNvQMD2
         Hrp3A/roKdtr6Fmn6DF0aN4oo23iQJLCr5zYzgmKh5QsDZWYozotZHp/W3nHYHUFRsgb
         IiK/J76O68d7CzQZ0blBAgnKHhW9eUdJON+r82MaFPvKik96V6hVsAK8iTMVzRzaqDYK
         4cfkZWu5392+Q8cpM61O0EyVCegEbRoBdaxEquY5fQ4xRxIJXzBEYEiDXbocAlcFj6m5
         XaoP7gUldd2wRq9wxNj71agngERfLFCoMcOmmY9O+CzeKR9HakYwcgKq9UkwOrrqVgbw
         Fybw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.66.78.10 with SMTP id x10mr21742266paw.80.1341239674325; Mon,
 02 Jul 2012 07:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.76.202 with HTTP; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:34:34 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:34:34 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAJJ04x7oir_m0ew4E8Oa=2QKnqdNo42U58RS4NOP3fpy4+rXDA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Any reason to limit one's self to a single high level java client?
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>
To: user <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042e00f958c96c04c3d9b20b

--f46d042e00f958c96c04c3d9b20b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I recognize that behind the scenes there's connection pooling and all kinds
of nice asynchronous dispatch of requests to cassandra, but is there any
sort of reason to avoid using different Java clients in the same
application?

I'm noticing that some are better suited to certain kinds activity than
others.

Dave

--f46d042e00f958c96c04c3d9b20b
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1

I recognize that behind the scenes there&#39;s connection pooling and all kinds of nice asynchronous dispatch of requests to cassandra, but is there any sort of reason to avoid using different Java clients in the same application?<div>
<br></div><div>I&#39;m noticing that some are better suited to certain kinds activity than others.</div><div><br></div><div>Dave</div>

--f46d042e00f958c96c04c3d9b20b--