From user-return-27345-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org Mon Jul 2 14:45:14 2012 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C9A9CFCE for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2012 14:45:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36513 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2012 14:45:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 36492 invoked by uid 500); 2 Jul 2012 14:45:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 36475 invoked by uid 99); 2 Jul 2012 14:45:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:45:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FSL_RCVD_USER,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of boneill42@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.43 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.43] (HELO mail-yw0-f43.google.com) (209.85.213.43) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 14:45:04 +0000 Received: by yhl10 with SMTP id 10so67710yhl.30 for ; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:44:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:message-id:thread-topic:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-type; bh=7UJO/yjOJ+4yLoZl7B8d6z2bHv5qmr5deY7PYDcJrsc=; b=mWqr9CUevM942RQJ9I0ZiMeFcvoeyDsZOd9r4c8PgycAatjww8TWxR54zPtha3Axsk fF23k1Rsisa+BHLW5H4lF+inhikpeJUg7MrYEm1ctz1VIYoaOBPL5JaeiK28ATAyOMVt z1EhWT9wWScPNibEU/Aow4Zv2vfGZrkFH1Wtx6lKLjlE6/7cGBuSHNOvEAVXFY+JN1Y+ 8wjNnDYC3g7C3yWYUT+1cI3NyvwcyL+FZRBVfZDFV+aTvOZLlgtxBpVQPqClGcYvy4Rd uiuMukHGFSFpVnOyGtySr+HSiDDszxq3dtivqZQr1qb0N7izbSWT1xXpacmycgieqcRn O8kA== Received: by 10.236.77.164 with SMTP id d24mr16345420yhe.129.1341240283531; Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:44:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.60.71.81] ([67.132.206.254]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r8sm11590450ani.9.2012.07.02.07.44.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 02 Jul 2012 07:44:42 -0700 (PDT) User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.1.0.101012 Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2012 10:44:35 -0400 Subject: Re: Any reason to limit one's self to a single high level java client? From: Brian O'Neill To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Any reason to limit one's self to a single high level java client? In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3424070682_400240" X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3424070682_400240 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit The only trouble you might run into is classpath conflicts, but as long as they are using compatible versions of common dependencies you should be okay. -brian -- Brian O'Neill Lead Architect, Software Development Health Market Science | 2700 Horizon Drive | King of Prussia, PA 19406 p: 215.588.6024 www.healthmarketscience.com From: David Leimbach Reply-To: Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:34:34 -0700 To: user Subject: Any reason to limit one's self to a single high level java client? I recognize that behind the scenes there's connection pooling and all kinds of nice asynchronous dispatch of requests to cassandra, but is there any sort of reason to avoid using different Java clients in the same application? I'm noticing that some are better suited to certain kinds activity than others. Dave --B_3424070682_400240 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
The only trouble y= ou might run into is classpath conflicts, but as long as they are using comp= atible versions of common dependencies you should be okay.

-brian

-- 
Brian O'Neill
Lead Architect, Software Development
Health Market Science | = 2700 Horizon Drive | King of Prussia, PA 19406
p: 215.588.6024
=
www.healthmarketscience.com
<= /div>

From: Da= vid Leimbach <leimy2k@gmail.com>= ;
Reply-To: <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 07:34:34 -0700
To: user <user@cassandra.apache.org>
= Subject: Any reason to limit one's self to a single high level java = client?

I recognize that behind the scenes there's c= onnection pooling and all kinds of nice asynchronous dispatch of requests to= cassandra, but is there any sort of reason to avoid using different Java cl= ients in the same application?

I'm noticing that some are= better suited to certain kinds activity than others.

Dave
--B_3424070682_400240--