Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C42C69264 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:12:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45342 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2012 19:12:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 45317 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2012 19:12:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 45309 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2012 19:12:56 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:12:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.172] (HELO mail-vx0-f172.google.com) (209.85.220.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:12:50 +0000 Received: by vcbfk13 with SMTP id fk13so4266382vcb.31 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:12:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=yw4M9RuGSqVKt+MQll0BOhZskxx8JkFp+4n/zh2YVmM=; b=NGeAeCsfMIHmHe4s6FqRRk1h/ThPYmeMjezFTTva1sXr4O9o9ySImIlsLLXGy0MsM6 UzUskt+941sPGz66ONS3d9e4X5ZB/Mmh0s+BmqNPQuzVk5XszlWKJskVmwagvuqpnB/j jmN7okNNYLKGBVlv2nE1flRYY004sm8Mo3dDNicRpGThqHmIspNUfM2Tsn6Mang6+b4I P496UZr9Z5rLcJdM64QikJMa+L7qBFWOPuG8BvaZh0L2tldkKsp2kDaYsxwosxmg8Rwd wcuNwBZzV+TzUI5Iw0o0j/oM/b10R9tN7vfUql6iO6IdhO2nU7vxJMkVXnAwZZ3bMIGz PW4g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.95.3 with SMTP id dg3mr5363309vdb.127.1331838748806; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:12:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.76.66 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 12:12:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <638859F2-AF96-4533-8F5D-BD524056FADD@venarc.com> References: <638859F2-AF96-4533-8F5D-BD524056FADD@venarc.com> Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:12:28 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Single Node Cassandra Installation From: "R. Verlangen" To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf3071cc50854caa04bb4cdf48 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnP9E7EPuN3wcf1t4zcZ+/yztCbEb6KSxvUR+3dWYITqd6gXXL8M9f48AJHDLCOQqtrTXgh X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --20cf3071cc50854caa04bb4cdf48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Drew, One other disadvantage is the lack of "consistency level" and "replication". Both ware part of the high availability / redundancy. So you would really need to backup your single-node-"cluster" to some other external location. Good luck! 2012/3/15 Drew Kutcharian > Hi, > > We are working on a project that initially is going to have very little > data, but we would like to use Cassandra to ease the future scalability. > Due to budget constraints, we were thinking to run a single node Cassandra > for now and then add more nodes as required. > > I was wondering if it is recommended to run a single node cassandra in > production? Are there any other issues besides lack of high availability? > > Thanks, > > Drew > > --20cf3071cc50854caa04bb4cdf48 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Drew,

One other disadvantage is the lack of "con= sistency level" and "replication". Both ware part of the hig= h availability / redundancy. So you would really need to backup your single= -node-"cluster" to some other external location.

Good luck!

2012/3/15 = Drew Kutcharian <dr= ew@venarc.com>
Hi,

We are working on a project that initially is going to have very little dat= a, but we would like to use Cassandra to ease the future scalability. Due t= o budget constraints, we were thinking to run a single node Cassandra for n= ow and then add more nodes as required.

I was wondering if it is recommended to run a single node cassandra in prod= uction? Are there any other issues besides lack of high availability?

Thanks,

Drew


--20cf3071cc50854caa04bb4cdf48--