Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 12C7F93AE for ; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62632 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2011 02:40:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 62566 invoked by uid 500); 30 Dec 2011 02:40:52 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 62558 invoked by uid 99); 30 Dec 2011 02:40:52 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:40:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of scode@scode.org designates 209.85.212.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.172] (HELO mail-wi0-f172.google.com) (209.85.212.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Dec 2011 02:40:44 +0000 Received: by wibhj6 with SMTP id hj6so8322084wib.31 for ; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:40:23 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.134.69 with SMTP id r47mr20787933wei.17.1325212823788; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:40:23 -0800 (PST) Sender: scode@scode.org Received: by 10.180.99.34 with HTTP; Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:40:23 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [71.202.44.53] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 18:40:23 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -yzj0n161LivpqF4rYozpyCVljw Message-ID: Subject: Re: Consistency Level From: Peter Schuller To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > Thanks for the response Peter! I checked everything and it look good to me. > > I am stuck with this for almost 2 days now. Has anyone had this issue? While it is certainly possible that you're running into a bug, it seems unlikely to me since it is the kind of bug that would affect almost anyone if it is failing with Unavailable due to unrelated (not in replica sets) nodes being down. Can you please post back with (1) the ring layout ('nodetool ring'), and (2) the exact row key that you're testing with? You might also want to run with DEBUG level (modify log4j-server.properties at the top) and the strategy (assuming you are using NetworkTopologyStrategy) will log selected endpoints, and confirm that it's indeed picking endpoints that you think it should based on getendpoints. -- / Peter Schuller (@scode, http://worldmodscode.wordpress.com)