Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 28CDE7672 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 18:26:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 78539 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2011 18:26:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 78510 invoked by uid 500); 9 Nov 2011 18:26:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 78502 invoked by uid 99); 9 Nov 2011 18:26:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:26:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of prvs=28759913f=bburruss@expedia.com designates 216.251.112.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.251.112.223] (HELO mx1b.expedia.com) (216.251.112.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 Nov 2011 18:26:24 +0000 X-SRBS: None X-HAT: Sender Group RELAYLIST, Policy $RELAYED applied. Received: from unknown (HELO CHC-EXCHNA02.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM) ([10.184.69.26]) by mx1b.sea.corp.expecn.com with ESMTP; 09 Nov 2011 11:26:02 -0700 Received: from CHC-CCR02.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM ([fe80:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0.0.0.1]) by CHC-EXCHNA02.SEA.CORP.EXPECN.COM ([10.184.69.26]) with mapi; Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:26:01 -0800 From: Todd Burruss To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:26:00 -0800 Subject: Row Groups Thread-Topic: Row Groups Thread-Index: AcyfDQg+sh8hWJqfQciat5BwXEkWeQ== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.13.0.110805 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CAE0052A6C1Abburrussexpediacom_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --_000_CAE0052A6C1Abburrussexpediacom_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable [Changed subject to leave survey behind] Cool, thx. Holding my breath for "row groups" :O I see it is targeted for 1.1, is this realistic? From: Jake Luciani > Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" > Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:06:23 -0800 To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" > Subject: Re: Second Cassandra users survey Solandra does this https://github.com/tjake/Solandra/blob/solandra/src/luca= ndra/dht/RandomPartitioner.java But Row Groups is going to be the "official" way. -Jake On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Todd Burruss > wrote: Thx jake for the JIRA, but there was someone at the conference that had alr= eady implemented what I mentioned. It didn't offer any atomicity, just co-= locating a family of data on the same node. From: Jake Luciani > Reply-To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" > Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 02:53:20 -0800 To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" > Subject: Re: Second Cassandra users survey Hi Todd, Entity Groups : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-1684 -Jake --_000_CAE0052A6C1Abburrussexpediacom_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
[Changed subject to leav= e survey behind]

Cool, thx.  Holding my breat= h for "row groups" :O

I see it is targeted for 1.1= , is this realistic?

=
From: Jake Luciani <jake= rs@gmail.com>
Reply-To: = "user@cassandra.apache.org= " <user@cassandra.apache.or= g>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011= 10:06:23 -0800
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" <user@cassandra.apache.org>Subject: Re: Second Cassandra us= ers survey

Solandra does this https://github.com/tjake/Solandra/blob/solandra/src/lucandra/dht/R= andomPartitioner.java

But Row Groups is going to be = the "official" way.

-Jake

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Todd Burruss &l= t;bburruss@expedia.com> wrote:
Thx jake for the JIRA, but there was someone at the conference that had a= lready implemented what I mentioned.  It didn't offer any atomicity, j= ust co-locating a family of data on the same node.

From: = Jake Luciani <jak= ers@gmail.com>
Reply-To: = "user@cassa= ndra.apache.org" <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 02:53:20 -0800
To: "user@cassandra.apache.org" <user@cassandra.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Sec= ond Cassandra users survey

<= /div>Hi Todd,


-Jake
<= br>
 --_000_CAE0052A6C1Abburrussexpediacom_--