Return-Path: 
 <user-return-22480-apmail-cassandra-user-archive=cassandra.apache.org@cassandra.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA9619A1A
	for <apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:56:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 16870 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2011 08:56:17 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16803 invoked by uid 500); 20 Nov 2011 08:56:16 -0000
Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:user@cassandra.apache.org>
List-Id: <user.cassandra.apache.org>
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org
Received: (qmail 16794 invoked by uid 99); 20 Nov 2011 08:56:16 -0000
Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:56:16 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.6 required=5.0
	tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dnd1066@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-ww0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:56:07 +0000
Received: by wwe5 with SMTP id 5so6519710wwe.25
        for <user@cassandra.apache.org>; Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:55:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=hsRODstnxA/gs50PJIvP4cLhWICxmWU09JJ6XNFZlAc=;
        b=mWGm7C08NIzAXx7HVHwUMs/vNP5yKIZABiTqBn3HshOBSji+y17D25F0eBfgq4jCmt
         oAnVH0COm6HBn5ARkA7ETz/D9HpAunPH/VPuQQG834yla/Id6IVYlBEyMIxxM0BtnilY
         jmFb0iOxcBxJ/9v6Jj5ahejEBUVqlIyfYWnBY=
Received: by 10.227.207.201 with SMTP id fz9mr6063626wbb.25.1321779347089;
        Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:55:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (93-96-159-41.zone4.bethere.co.uk.
 [93.96.159.41])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id co5sm3173015wib.8.2011.11.20.00.55.45
        (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
        Sun, 20 Nov 2011 00:55:46 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4EC8C090.4040406@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 08:55:44 +0000
From: Guy Incognito <dnd1066@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
 rv:8.0) Gecko/20111105 Thunderbird/8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Subject: UUIDType
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

am i correct that neither of Cassandra's UUIDTypes (at least in 0.7) 
compare UUIDs according to RFC4122 (ie as two unsigned longs)?