Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of teddyyyy123@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.213.44 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAAnh3__5-HjBeaNC10nv=0a57_MAHs0T8_v1h+vbD=_oMOmtGA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAAnh3__5-HjBeaNC10nv=0a57_MAHs0T8_v1h+vbD=_oMOmtGA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 10:49:10 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAAnh3_9poTO+cqJKShh6dmC7thGMnXn=ntVA1CKT+XfX0PfRHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: different size sstable on different nodes?
From: Yang <teddyyyy123@gmail.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

"46e70d80": [["00000132f3726cbb303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303030303164316366666633","4e945b0e",1318344486784,"d"]

for the timestamp
perl -e 'print gmtime(1318344486)."\n" '
Tue Oct 11 14:48:06 2011

$ TZ=GMT date
Tue Oct 11 17:40:31 GMT 2011


so it's almost 3 hours old, but I just finished running the
compaction, and GC_SECONDS is 7200 , set short for testing purpose. so
this deletion column should have been thrown away during the
compaction


On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Yang <teddyyyy123@gmail.com> wrote:
> after I did a major compaction on both nodes in my test cluster,
> I found that for the same CF, one node has a 100MB sstable file, while
> the other has a 1GB one.
>
> since GC_grace is set into schema, and both nodes have the same
> config, how could this happen?
>
> I'm still going through sstable2json to figure out, just want to see
> if there are any
> apparent things I missed
>
> thanks
> Yang
>