yes, should have been
And an explanation of why we normally avoid *EBS*.
My bad.
-----------------
Aaron Morton
Freelance Cassandra Developer
@aaronmorton
http://www.thelastpickle.com
On 10/10/2011, at 9:03 PM, Sasha Dolgy wrote:
> just catching the tail end of this discussion. aaron, in your previous email, you said
"And an explanation of why we normally avoid ephemeral. " .... shouldn't this be, avoiding
EBS? EBS was a nightmare for us in terms of performance.
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 9:23 AM, aaron morton <aaron@thelastpickle.com> wrote:
> 6 nodes and RF3 will mean you can handle between 1 and 2 failed nodes.
>
> see http://thelastpickle.com/2011/06/13/Down-For-Me/
> Cheers
>
> -----------------
> Aaron Morton
> Freelance Cassandra Developer
> @aaronmorton
> http://www.thelastpickle.com
>
> On 7/10/2011, at 9:37 PM, Madalina Matei wrote:
>
>> Hi Aaron,
>>
>> For a 6 nodes cluster, what RF can we use in order to support 2 failed nodes?
>> From the article that you sent i understood "avoid EMS" and use ephemeral. am i missing
anything?
>>
>> Thank you so much for your help,
>> Madaina
>> On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 9:15 AM, aaron morton <aaron@thelastpickle.com> wrote:
>> Data Stax have pre build AMI's here http://www.datastax.com/dev/blog/setting-up-a-cassandra-cluster-with-the-datastax-ami
>>
>> And an explanation of why we normally avoid ephemeral.
>>
>> Also, I would go with 6 nodes. You will then be able to handle up to 2 failed nodes.
>>
>> Hope that helps.
>>
>
|