Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 81FE79F79 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:48:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 1728 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2011 05:48:06 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 1674 invoked by uid 500); 29 Sep 2011 05:48:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 1655 invoked by uid 99); 29 Sep 2011 05:48:05 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:48:05 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of watcherfr@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-ww0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:47:59 +0000 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so327924wwf.25 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:47:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=yxKiZYAwnGwLgpREpzQamEbGFFsmmBQG93Yi2c3q8Kc=; b=nNgAOZ8uTsKa5c/dTZ+4Whcub1o8+2u8O2g/TbBcCKVjBtGn2fZEZjGp6/WCLZU4C6 rZDV7oaYH+cuqPxCidEMtC8uBeogGWL675Ph+KMKYkxhlTQEgsyLNsRzKEEs4Eycz2aY 7vmkaMqIDK0oC4DkQ1aj0jWL6ln/RRo/3cYBk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.155.84 with SMTP id r20mr4928960wbw.107.1317275258695; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.87.135 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.87.135 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 22:47:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 07:47:38 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: GC for ParNew on 0.8.6 From: Philippe To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367fb998ddb18204ae0e0b71 --0016367fb998ddb18204ae0e0b71 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable No it was an upgrade from 0.8.4 or 0.8.5 depending on the nodes. No cassandra-env files were changed during the update. Any other ideas? The cluster has just been weird ever since running 0.8.6 = : has anyone else upgraded and not run into this? Le 28 sept. 2011 09:32, "Peter Schuller" a =E9crit : >> I have changed absolutely nothing and the work load is perhaps even lowe= r >> than before upgrading because I have paused most updates to the cluster. Did >> a log level change or does this have deeper meaning ? > > You don't say which version you upgraded from but I suspect 0.7? JVM > options like heap size calculations have changed. I am guessing you're > seeing it in the logs because the young generation was sized > differently, causing young generation garbage collections to be longer > than before and thus triggering the logging by the Cassandra > GCInspector. > > -- > / Peter Schuller (@scode on twitter) --0016367fb998ddb18204ae0e0b71 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No it was an upgrade from 0.8.4 or 0.8.5 depending on the nodes.
No cassandra-env files were changed during the update.
Any other ideas?=A0 The cluster has just been weird ever since running 0.8.= 6 : has anyone else upgraded and not run into this?

Le 28 sept. 2011 09:32, "Peter Schuller&quo= t; <pet= er.schuller@infidyne.com> a =E9crit=A0:
>= > I have changed absolutely nothing and the work load is perhaps even lo= wer
>> than before upgrading because I have paused most updates to the cl= uster. Did
>> a log level change or does this have deeper meaning = ?
>
> You don't say which version you upgraded from but I = suspect 0.7? JVM
> options like heap size calculations have changed. I am guessing you= 9;re
> seeing it in the logs because the young generation was sized> differently, causing young generation garbage collections to be long= er
> than before and thus triggering the logging by the Cassandra
> G= CInspector.
>
> --
> / Peter Schuller (@scode on twitte= r)
--0016367fb998ddb18204ae0e0b71--