Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BE1979C0 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:44:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27114 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2011 18:44:09 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 27060 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2011 18:44:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 27052 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2011 18:44:07 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:44:07 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.220.172] (HELO mail-vx0-f172.google.com) (209.85.220.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 18:43:58 +0000 Received: by vxi29 with SMTP id 29so3530496vxi.31 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:43:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.176.97 with SMTP id ch1mr85135vdc.297.1313779417668; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:43:37 -0700 (PDT) Sender: scode@scode.org Received: by 10.52.164.131 with HTTP; Fri, 19 Aug 2011 11:43:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [213.114.154.128] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 20:43:37 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 9W4Q9o_28ax4_GrU8bECMGh0CME Message-ID: Subject: Re: Urgent:!! Re: Need to maintenance on a cassandra node, are there problems with this process From: Peter Schuller To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org > I am running read/write at quorum. At this point I have turned off my > clients from talking to this node. So if that is the case I can potentially > just nodetool repair (without changing IP). But would it be better if I No, other nodes in the cluster will still be sending reads to the node. > copied over the data/mykeyspace from another replica and then run repair? The key thing is that unless you're willing to accept the node serving reads with incorrect data, you need the node to initiate a normal bootstrapping process whereby it starts taking writes as it is bootstrapping, but won't take reads until it's done. This requires that other nodes know that it is joining the ring; if you just pop it back in they won't know that. -- / Peter Schuller (@scode on twitter)