Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E80E939FE for ; Wed, 4 May 2011 16:39:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 9026 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:39:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 9000 invoked by uid 500); 4 May 2011 16:39:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 8992 invoked by uid 99); 4 May 2011 16:39:36 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:39:36 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of etamme@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.44] (HELO mail-ww0-f44.google.com) (74.125.82.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 May 2011 16:39:29 +0000 Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so1267947wwa.25 for ; Wed, 04 May 2011 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Bfbzmifw09Djc1Q+GaRy/QfWSIxyd5anGTv5zXkciEE=; b=LgAff/S70cYduUpxqdmlOiqQwLWi3Oba6Ixw0Ak8UAJd4hxEVhOGPpZQAqMSHI+vmk 0liSUFTnQ3VinCgVebVdh8OZnNTQPNyscXCoX+xa0HtSKIGkx0Eyfrg2l9k7wZI0Pj1z wsDTsjS2mdwQuz7gZ4gJEEo3tHuihUsXZDB30= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=OEbdmZxkNr9tyDOcc0/R/4iqJG+pmMUc07ZXS26D3JPfMhqGI3TINtvMiX0zFScQ8k DRq14MXgYY+H/NI1QFUrTWE1Y9OwF3S8IfvjBGRu6lqsUoOFLd490WGxv/4zKK0fuJZg vVyASB0nyc1zaRdTVz1w4HPzV/fS0cxo95hfE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.221.103 with SMTP id q81mr1325819wep.83.1304527149218; Wed, 04 May 2011 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.156.149 with HTTP; Wed, 4 May 2011 09:39:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 12:39:09 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Node setup - recommended hardware From: Eric tamme To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:25 PM, Anthony Ikeda wrote: > I just want to ask, when setting up nodes in a Node ring is it worthwhile > using a 2 partition setup? i.e. Cassandra on the Primary, data directories > etc on the second partition or does it really not make a difference? > Anthony > I don't think it makes much difference from a performance perspective at all. You might want to create a separate LVM for your data, or entire /var