incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Peter Lin <wool...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Cassandra Vs. Oracle Coherence
Date Fri, 20 May 2011 17:05:17 GMT
Although one can use Coherence as a memory cache layer on top of a DB,
many customer use it in the financial sector as a in-memory key/value
store.

Think of transient data that doesn't need to be saved, but needs to
scale out across hundreds or thousands of nodes.

memcached is making progress, but it is not comparable to coherence
today. Eventually it will probably get there.

On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:00 PM, mcasandra <mohitanchlia@gmail.com> wrote:
> Coherence is similar to memcachd (free). It's in memory cache layer on top of
> the DB. You as a user need to keep that cache in sync with the DB.
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Cassandra-Vs-Oracle-Coherence-tp6375561p6386847.html
> Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>

Mime
View raw message