incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Eric Evans <eev...@rackspace.com>
Subject Re: Terrible CQL idea: > and < aliases of >= and <=
Date Mon, 02 May 2011 15:46:01 GMT
On Mon, 2011-05-02 at 10:41 -0500, Jonathan Ellis wrote:
> Where is that happening then?  RelationType.forString is not lossy,
> and neither is the RelationType -> IndexExpression conversion in
> getIndexedSlices.

WhereClause.and(Relation) where it assigns start/end keys.

-- 
Eric Evans
eevans@rackspace.com


Mime
View raw message