Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jbellis@gmail.com designates
 209.85.212.44 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=GcbiJbzcUZHvAnIKHzJ8j4aoCAsXXwWzAtP5e63SeYWbLy6uyiNVMNdxpj8BDFUDTD
         Re1Z/xhWgOnufDzbDDiox1FO4LmP+e9adxoqErKMySghrCUvt/mgLQ2ETSDAzmiBaYlM
         t9T792DZ7sN26Srri10RBn8GXPmRQ2vbJNboo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=aYn38K1hFHS0xG=GB-u1waiftTp8te2C-up0o@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=aYn38K1hFHS0xG=GB-u1waiftTp8te2C-up0o@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2011 10:47:51 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTinbe0XnxTY92CONniUeKfEGGtk-ntu+1+GU5g7R@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Is secondary index consistent with its base table?
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Cc: Alvin UW <alvinuw@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Yes, this is guaranteed the same way single-row updates are guaranteed
to be atomic (the commitlog).

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Alvin UW <alvinuw@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was wondering whether Secondary Index is consistent with its base table?
> How did you guarantee the consistency?
>
> Thanks
>
> Alvin
>


-- 
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder of DataStax, the source for professional Cassandra support
http://www.datastax.com