Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 98345 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 02:26:56 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 02:26:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 71892 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 02:26:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 71866 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 02:26:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 71857 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 02:26:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71854 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 02:26:54 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:26:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bllhastings@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.175] (HELO mail-iy0-f175.google.com) (209.85.210.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:26:48 +0000 Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so2322315iyb.6 for ; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:26:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=4NNbb2KFKCyDbymcux6/czf3EUsfCw+FB9YeZZm3C1w=; b=KYqe2X6Ys8qTKi1JzgufyrZsmubDJOBdXgtHrJh/repbobHm851NkcgKdwErDR8da5 X0n46LQDa7QYLVx4Whj0g6eWiQ5AT23zDJjBCdpofpHpksfJpJWYYekjdx8vtEDyFr6h fGQL28SUhbrBCd5r5hQx0yXc+rsHiJrRLUdRc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=K9b8XLYx2eXmi/3N9YAw0asVWhTing7tkhcLDLUAixMIn49oKTB24GjbXbMq3t6L1V j+Nc/vuB+/z39h2XP+NRVPYIAwJDLw8a5QQ8YLT4xGIxcbJSJt4bA/KQbzNaR24P+RK6 IP3a/K0/DpPvC5AKseoOZLXVmtpQvN1w0K34Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.42.152.3 with SMTP id g3mr932860icw.149.1299810387539; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.221.202 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Mar 2011 18:26:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:26:27 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: memory utilization From: Bill Hastings To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6e85066cb53d049e2bb06e --90e6ba6e85066cb53d049e2bb06e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All Memory utilization reported by JCOnsole for Cassandra seems to be much lesser than that reported by top ("RES" memory). Can someone explain this? Maybe off topic but would appreciate a response. -- Cheers Bill --90e6ba6e85066cb53d049e2bb06e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi All

Memory utilization reported by JCOnsole for Cassandra seems to be much lesser than that reported by top ("RES" memory). Can someone explain this? Maybe off topic but would appreciate a response.

--
Cheers
Bill
--90e6ba6e85066cb53d049e2bb06e--