Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 3384 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 20:56:13 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 20:56:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 90689 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 20:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 90665 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 20:56:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 90657 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2011 20:56:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90654 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2011 20:56:11 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:56:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of mohitanchlia@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 20:56:05 +0000 Received: from jim.nabble.com ([192.168.236.80]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Py9NA-0004cu-KL for cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:55:44 -0800 Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 12:55:44 -0800 (PST) From: mcasandra To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <1299876944622-6162837.post@n2.nabble.com> Subject: Seed MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I've read in some posts before and on the wiki that all the nodes in the cluster should have same seed list and 2 is the no. of seeds recommended. My question is it advisable to have node seed itself. Say for eg Node A, Node B and Node C in a cluster have a seed list of A and B. Now according to the recommendation even Node A will have seed of A and B, but it somehow looks wrong. Am I reading it incorrectly? -- View this message in context: http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Seed-tp6162837p6162837.html Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at Nabble.com.