Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 76642 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2011 20:09:36 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 15 Feb 2011 20:09:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 85807 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 20:09:33 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 84256 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 20:09:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 84178 invoked by uid 500); 15 Feb 2011 20:09:30 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 84175 invoked by uid 99); 15 Feb 2011 20:09:30 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:09:30 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of javier.canillas@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.47] (HELO mail-yw0-f47.google.com) (209.85.213.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:09:23 +0000 Received: by ywi6 with SMTP id 6so278566ywi.6 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:09:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Jq9RtAd4xqG5JEchyKfiFC6hGy2v+LGzG5e/X/PLITI=; b=o90T2RqdyyI0xeTrgjCfpiSQKwQmxmT0+InWKT/lC74vOoSGxvmbCpSOQVa19AFtA3 HL/AAZyXddLDH5Vct1J4VPEWjR8Rrnqbw79xW/Cr5zUxGm6i0l3R9cIKcs83b7T0037V eNAL3ISPJjn2jcbVkphGZMDoviizk6Vkq8ts0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=PDumVhyYbxGPKHeCV9e0NQrpGp6iIjQG80vixH/wzwhLFPjGoWxLGMjAmZzuRhvI1o iTJrA/iZROTopq9ItqD6F3wMjberzPo0Y26iL2zySQ9nIGKtIHgUX/yshfFbSzqkgRqw 65bnBGeqce2c3CyZdtFlGVmeJ7AS42IWoAqNE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.109.166 with SMTP id s26mr4318294yhg.76.1297800542740; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:09:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.105.137 with HTTP; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 12:09:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1297800233144-6029047.post@n2.nabble.com> References: <1297798858975-6028966.post@n2.nabble.com> <1297800233144-6029047.post@n2.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:09:02 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What is the most solid version of Cassandra? No secondary indexes needed. From: Javier Canillas To: user@cassandra.apache.org Cc: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0023547c8bad56e2f0049c57bc55 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0023547c8bad56e2f0049c57bc55 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 We have been running a 0.6.3 with some custom features for more than 1 month and it has been running fine. we are planning on moving to 0.7.1 in about 1 month from now if it past our stress tests. If you are really going from scratch to production environment, I would definetly go with 0.7.1 after some heavy stress test, it will give you a better migration process to any new version. Javier Canillas On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:03 PM, buddhasystem wrote: > > Thank you! It's just that 7.1 seems the bleeding edge now (a serious bug > fixed today). Would you still trust it as a production-level service? I'm > just slightly concerned. I don't want to create a perception among our IT > that the product is not ready for prime time. > -- > View this message in context: > http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/What-is-the-most-solid-version-of-Cassandra-No-secondary-indexes-needed-tp6028966p6029047.html > Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > --0023547c8bad56e2f0049c57bc55 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable We have been running a 0.6.3 with some custom features for more than 1 mont= h and it has been running fine. we are planning on moving to 0.7.1 in about= 1 month from now if it past our stress tests.=C2=A0

If = you are really going from scratch to production environment, I would define= tly go with 0.7.1 after some heavy stress test, it will give you a better m= igration process to any new version.=C2=A0

Javier Canillas

On = Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:03 PM, buddhasystem <potekhin@bnl.gov> wrote:

Thank you! It's just that 7.1 seems the bleeding edge now (a serious bu= g
fixed today). Would you still trust it as a production-level service? I'= ;m
just slightly concerned. I don't want to create a perception among our = IT
that the product is not ready for prime time.
--
View this message in context: http:= //cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/What-is-the-mos= t-solid-version-of-Cassandra-No-secondary-indexes-needed-tp6028966p6029047.= html
Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org = mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--0023547c8bad56e2f0049c57bc55--