incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Javier Canillas <javier.canil...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: What is the most solid version of Cassandra? No secondary indexes needed.
Date Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:09:02 GMT
We have been running a 0.6.3 with some custom features for more than 1 month
and it has been running fine. we are planning on moving to 0.7.1 in about 1
month from now if it past our stress tests.

If you are really going from scratch to production environment, I would
definetly go with 0.7.1 after some heavy stress test, it will give you a
better migration process to any new version.

Javier Canillas

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 5:03 PM, buddhasystem <potekhin@bnl.gov> wrote:

>
> Thank you! It's just that 7.1 seems the bleeding edge now (a serious bug
> fixed today). Would you still trust it as a production-level service? I'm
> just slightly concerned. I don't want to create a perception among our IT
> that the product is not ready for prime time.
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/What-is-the-most-solid-version-of-Cassandra-No-secondary-indexes-needed-tp6028966p6029047.html
> Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>

Mime
View raw message