incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthew Dennis <mden...@datastax.com>
Subject Re: What is the most solid version of Cassandra? No secondary indexes needed.
Date Tue, 15 Feb 2011 20:00:12 GMT
0.7.1 is what I would go with right now.  It's likely you'll eventually have
to upgrade that as well, but moving to other 0.7.x releases should be fairly
painless.  Most development is happening on the 0.7 releases, which already
have lots of fixes over the 0.6 series (not to mention performance
improvements and better logging in general).

On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 1:40 PM, buddhasystem <potekhin@bnl.gov> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> we are acquiring new hardware for our cluster and will be installing it
> soon. It's likely that I won't need to rely on secondary index
> functionality, as data will be write-once read-many and I can get away with
> inverse index creation at load time, plus I have some more complex indexing
> in mind than comes packaged (too much to explain here).
>
> So, if I don't need indexes, what is the most stable, reliable version of
> Cassandra that I can put in production? I'm seeing bug reports here and
> some
> sound quite serious, I just want something that works day in, day out.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Maxim
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/What-is-the-most-solid-version-of-Cassandra-No-secondary-indexes-needed-tp6028966p6028966.html
> Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at
> Nabble.com.
>

Mime
View raw message