incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Nick Santini <>
Subject Re: batch mutate with only deletions on 0.7beta2
Date Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:58:14 GMT
thats not exactly what im seeing, is not a row, but columns on a row that i
was deleting

suppose i have a row where the key is sec_index_1 where i have two columns
with information about other row keys
sec_index_1 { key1:key1, key2:key2 }

then i add a deletion for the column named key2, run it through batch mutate
for the key sec_index_1

then i load the row again to see all my "references" stored in columns, and
im still getting
key1, key2

Nicolas Santini

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Tyler Hobbs <> wrote:

> There's no problem doing deletions with batch_mutate, but you are probably
> seeing this:
> - Tyler
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Nick Santini <>wrote:
>> since the 0.7beta2 version doesnt support indexes for Super CF or for
>> columns that you might not now the name yet, im supporting them manually by
>> adding a row on the same CF where the key is the name of the column plus the
>> value, and in the columns hold the key to the referenced rows
>> this works as in i can actually find my rows using the secondary index
>> rows
>> but when i try to delete the original row i want to update my secondary
>> indexs, so i create a mutation map in the same way i did it when i saved my
>> information, but this time it only contains deletions for those secondary
>> indexs rows and only for the column referencing to the row being deleted.
>> but this doesnt seem to work, it comes back successfully (no erros), but
>> im still able to find the references to the deleted row in those secondary
>> indexes
>> is there any issue trying to run a batch_mutate with only deletions?
>> thanks
>> Nicolas Santini

View raw message