Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 65582 invoked from network); 15 Nov 2010 14:54:28 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Nov 2010 14:54:28 -0000 Received: (qmail 9104 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2010 14:54:58 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 9037 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2010 14:54:58 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 9029 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2010 14:54:58 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:54:58 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.216.44] (HELO mail-qw0-f44.google.com) (209.85.216.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 14:54:50 +0000 Received: by qwi2 with SMTP id 2so202605qwi.31 for ; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 06:54:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.190.147 with SMTP id di19mr5178593qcb.91.1289832869147; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 06:54:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.181.83 with HTTP; Mon, 15 Nov 2010 06:54:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 06:54:29 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Rows in decreasing order From: Casey Deccio To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: > As you may have guessed from the lack of a "reversed" option on the > range slice api, backward scans are not supported. =A0The standard thing > to do is load the keys you are interested in as columns to a row. > That makes sense. Just needed a different way of thinking about it. Thanks for the clarification. Casey