Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 52856 invoked from network); 2 Sep 2010 20:47:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Sep 2010 20:47:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 64522 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 20:47:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 64429 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 20:47:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 64421 invoked by uid 500); 2 Sep 2010 20:47:52 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 64418 invoked by uid 99); 2 Sep 2010 20:47:52 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:47:52 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_NEUTRAL,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.139.236.158 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of AlvinUW@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.158] (HELO kuber.nabble.com) (216.139.236.158) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 20:47:47 +0000 Received: from jim.nabble.com ([192.168.236.80]) by kuber.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OrGgx-0000Vh-0B for cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2010 13:47:27 -0700 Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2010 13:47:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Alvin Jin To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Message-ID: <1283460446976-5492798.post@n2.nabble.com> Subject: Is the secondary index maintained synchronously in 0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello, I was thinking the details of the secondary index in 0.7. Will it be updated atomically with its base table? Any explaination the on secondary index is appreciated. Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Is-the-secondary-index-maintained-synchronously-in-0-7-tp5492798p5492798.html Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at Nabble.com.