But why does this situation happen?
I mean "but not in isolation".
Can we avoid it?
yes, it is updated atomically (but not in isolation, it's possible for
a client to see changes to one but not the other temporarily)
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Alvin Jin <AlvinUW@gmail.com> wrote:
> I was thinking the details of the secondary index in 0.7.
> Will it be updated atomically with its base table?
> Any explaination the on secondary index is appreciated.
> View this message in context: http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Is-the-secondary-index-maintained-synchronously-in-0-7-tp5492798p5492798.html
> Sent from the firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support