And now that everyone thinks I'm a complete dolt ;-), I realize should've been more clear and asked whether there's an intrinsic overhead in Keyspace itself that causes problems, or is it just the plain amount of CFs which is bad :-)
But I'm gathering that the Keyspace overhead is negliglible.
On Sep 7, 2010, at 19:32 , Ned Wolpert wrote:
This might be a loaded question... what is a 'lot of CFs'? 50? 250? 500? I say loaded because I know that its probably dependent on how many keys (size) are in a column family.
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 7:53 PM, Benjamin Black <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Yes, lots of CFs is bad means lots of CFs is also bad.
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 12:41 AM, Janne Jalkanen
> So if I read this right, using lots of CF's is also a Bad Idea(tm)?
Virtually, Ned Wolpert
"Settle thy studies, Faustus, and begin..." --Marlowe