incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jonathan Ellis <jbel...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is the secondary index maintained synchronously in 0.7
Date Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:53:24 GMT
because it's not worth the penalty to concurrency

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Alvin UW <alvinuw@gmail.com> wrote:
> Why the secondary index is not updated absolutely atomically?
>
> 2010/9/2 Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com>
>>
>> yes, it is updated atomically (but not in isolation, it's possible for
>> a client to see changes to one but not the other temporarily)
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 1:47 PM, Alvin Jin <AlvinUW@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I was thinking the details of the secondary index in 0.7.
>> > Will it be updated atomically with its base table?
>> >
>> > Any explaination the on secondary index is appreciated.
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > --
>> > View this message in context:
>> > http://cassandra-user-incubator-apache-org.3065146.n2.nabble.com/Is-the-secondary-index-maintained-synchronously-in-0-7-tp5492798p5492798.html
>> > Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive
>> > at Nabble.com.
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jonathan Ellis
>> Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
>> co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support
>> http://riptano.com
>
>



-- 
Jonathan Ellis
Project Chair, Apache Cassandra
co-founder of Riptano, the source for professional Cassandra support
http://riptano.com

Mime
View raw message