Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 56694 invoked from network); 29 Aug 2010 00:07:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Aug 2010 00:07:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 80141 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 00:07:54 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 80028 invoked by uid 500); 29 Aug 2010 00:07:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 80020 invoked by uid 99); 29 Aug 2010 00:07:53 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:07:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fracca@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.44 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.44] (HELO mail-qw0-f44.google.com) (209.85.216.44) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 29 Aug 2010 00:04:55 +0000 Received: by qwc9 with SMTP id 9so4265679qwc.31 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:04:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=OfLu7Efu+2y1x5qvZoDAmQ+6Xk6xSWUf9zQW8VX2c68=; b=uuf9elscTRfNrbNL/8wiLJyHOBPOiiV8zAiONHZmBwrqxq7/AyTTcmQ6v45+AGY8U3 jTTciTGzNUd+Z22mg2whOsWhnSpLCHPGvvoLrLi3QeB/wrbhyfupOKMot6kSl447hq0l LXhuM6DbblWngStjox4BoDz4vWUxc8n5dNX2E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=HXTItL1tPSrWEtPkImJ5DpccXOXFE7SgBZ9u3BMXCKxK4HfxDIcKmR37os052gOLsk vZ1ta+nvlYgyWd/WNIcR0+89qzViLX7CKx3u9g29iwFkE+FLZwNUF4+W3xfYcBWy3blk NCXSEJusNGR3Je4h3mqsa9tegnzuvC4XY5LHQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.52.31 with SMTP id f31mr1757250qcg.256.1283040274387; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:04:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.228.8 with HTTP; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 17:04:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 01:04:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Benchmarking Cassandra 0.6.5 with YCSB client ... drags to a halt From: Fernando Racca To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016367d5d74c993c7048eeb17ec X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016367d5d74c993c7048eeb17ec Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 thanks for the updates, i'm going to increase memory for the nodes. as for the remote latency, i'm puzzled On 29 August 2010 00:54, Benjamin Black wrote: > That means you only have a 1G heap. It's no surprise it dies (most > likely OOM; CMS runs are not inherently bad). Don't see immediately > why you are seeing the remote latency go up that high, but it is > unlikely yo be a Cassandra problem. > > --0016367d5d74c993c7048eeb17ec Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable thanks for the updates, i'm going to increase memory for the nodes. as = for the remote latency, i'm puzzled

= On 29 August 2010 00:54, Benjamin Black <b@b3k.us> wrote:
That means you only have a 1G heap. =C2=A0I= t's no surprise it dies (most
likely OOM; CMS runs are not inherently bad). =C2=A0Don't see immediate= ly
why you are seeing the remote latency go up that high, but it is
unlikely yo be a Cassandra problem.


--0016367d5d74c993c7048eeb17ec--