incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Thomas Heller <i...@zilence.net>
Subject Re: error using get_range_slice with random partitioner
Date Sat, 07 Aug 2010 11:11:28 GMT
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Peter Schuller
<peter.schuller@infidyne.com> wrote:
>> Remember the returned results are NOT sorted, so you whenever you are
>> dropping the first by default, you might be dropping a good one. At
>> least that would be my guess here.
>
> Sorry I may be forgetting something about this thread, but AFAIK the
> results from cassandra (the thrift API) are sorted. Maybe there was a
> client in between that did not preserve the sorting (I forget which
> thread that was).

Column slices are always sorted yes, we were talking about
get_RANGE_slices and the range of rows is not sorted (for RPP).

re incrementing/decrementing: you're right, I was only using my
inc/dec for UUID which are fixed length.

/thomas

Mime
View raw message