1. Performance data of network storage elements which may be required for performance tuning.
2. Data dictionaries.
3. Satellite communications.
4. General search applications.
below is the performance statistics compared to traditional Databases.

MySQL Comparison

•MySQL > 50 GB Data
Writes Average : ~300 ms
Reads Average : ~350 ms

•Cassandra > 50 GB Data
Writes Average : 0.12 ms
Reads Average : 15 ms

2010/6/1 ʷӢ <shiyingjie1983@gmail.com>
Thanks, but would you please describe it in more details, because most applications require fast response for retrieval.

2010/6/1 sharanabasava raddi <shivubasu@gmail.com>

The  applications which require bigger storage and fast response for retrieval.

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 6:13 PM, ʷӢ <shiyingjie1983@gmail.com> wrote:
     I found that most applications on Cassandra are for web applications, such as store friiend information or digg information, and they get good performance, many companies or groups want to move their applications to Cassandra,  so which kind of applications are Cassandra fit for?  Thanks a lot!