incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ned Wolpert <ned.wolp...@imemories.com>
Subject Re: http://voltdb.com/ ?
Date Wed, 09 Jun 2010 21:35:35 GMT
As far as finding its competitors go; If you need acid compliance, Cassandra
isn't in the list. If you need 50TB of data, is VoltDB in the list?

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Charles Woerner / IMAP <
charleswoerner@gmail.com> wrote:

> I would disagree with that assessment.  My take is that Voltdb is a high
> throughput, fault tolerant transaction processing db as opposed to a caching
> system or key value store.  It's easy to get hung up on the in-memory nature
> of it but I believe that it is both fault tolerant through redundant copies
> of the data and fully acid compliant.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Charles Woerner
>
> On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:09 PM, AJ Slater <aj@zuno.com> wrote:
>
> Its proper competitors are stuff like redis and memcached.
>
> On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 8:19 AM, Jones, Nick < <nick.jones@amd.com>
> nick.jones@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> I saw a tweet about claiming far better performance to Cassandra.  After
>> following up, I found out it requires the entire DB to reside in memory
>> across the nodes.
>>
>>
>>
>> *Nick Jones*
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Denis Haskin [mailto: <denis@haskinferguson.net>
>> denis@haskinferguson.net]
>> *Sent:* Friday, June 04, 2010 10:17 AM
>> *To:* user
>> *Subject:* <http://voltdb.com/>http://voltdb.com/ ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Anybody looked at VoltDB?  I haven't dug into it, but curious about it.
>>
>>
>> dwh
>>
>
>


-- 
Virtually, Ned Wolpert

"Settle thy studies, Faustus, and begin..."   --Marlowe

Mime
View raw message