Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of tsaloranta@gmail.com designates
 209.85.211.190 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=d/mXllnPrgBJjWuRNf1rs4H6ZXBXjZEKAw4vDb9TJzceXG98wamvy9ERXf9Kc5FrT9
         reF1xLfBsD3RGWNJVWKkwcCsYptmiaHv1eEn3dzTqMhPPAyGIMFNsIabmRE4Vwqkmfxx
         /hwC7H+4NoAem4nppSSzzGUrIY6Pxx+qAk8fg=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <h2ra4f278e51005040616o818d4870gadf6281adb1400cf@mail.gmail.com>
References: <n2wc2e29ea31004231229m918b0138y79f5e555c29eab65@mail.gmail.com>
	 <t2ne06563881004231233u9916fc08s694983f139d51d81@mail.gmail.com>
	 <9694240D-61A1-458D-8722-E26A0876771B@riskmetrics.com>
	 <m2le06563881004231255o22f1cf6r71a86c5c40ec1f88@mail.gmail.com>
	 <305AE17C-3655-46F0-AD77-CD5B390E0308@riskmetrics.com>
	 <i2h5f7770581004232158uafaf2953ne521dec19ee6b736@mail.gmail.com>
	 <ADB30376143F634DAF59E576BFB5D8D27359F7AD@mail-ab01.rmg-ny.com>
	 <u2u5f7770581004242328vafcdc917u6a1c278dd1b2f126@mail.gmail.com>
	 <w2gc9118d4c1005040234v5a83c3c0x80a7ccec6745f608@mail.gmail.com>
	 <h2ra4f278e51005040616o818d4870gadf6281adb1400cf@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2010 10:24:41 -0700
Message-ID: <k2u5f7770581005041024n9d91eb04vbc1e5259b952795b@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Trove maps
From: Tatu Saloranta <tsaloranta@gmail.com>
To: user@cassandra.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Oh boy... that stupid, stupid bickering about true nature of LGPL.
Both Apache Foundation and FSF appeared like little kids arguing over
whose dad is stronger (this was few years back, when it was discussed
whether LGPL components could be used for Apache License projects)
Almost made me explicitly bar use of Apache licenses for my own projects. ;=
-p

(no, there is absolutely no reason to avoid LGPL from ASL license
code, absolute none -- UNLESS code is (c) by FSF, in which case maybe
there is a problem).

But of course Apache can impose their own, however misguided silly
rules on projects under their umbrella. :-)

-+ Tatu +-

On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 6:16 AM, Boris Shulman <shulmanb@gmail.com> wrote:
> LGPL ia listed as a part of a forbidden licenses for apache projects
> (see Excluded Licenses in http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html)...
>
> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Jeff Hammerbacher <hammer@cloudera.com> =
wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> History repeating itself a bit, here: one delay in getting Cassandra int=
o
>> the open source world was removing its use of the Trove collections libr=
ary,
>> as the license (LGPL) is not compatible with the Apache 2.0 license.
>>
>> Later,
>> Jeff
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Tatu Saloranta <tsaloranta@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 6:27 AM, Carlos Sanchez
>>> <carlos.sanchez@riskmetrics.com> wrote:
>>> > There are forEach methods in =A0that would allow you to travel the
>>> > keys/values/entries w/o creating the extra object (entries)
>>>
>>> Ok. So if change was made, it'd make sense to ensure those were used
>>> for traversal. Thanks!
>>>
>>> -+ Tatu +-
>>
>>
>