incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jeff Zhang <zjf...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Why Cassandra is "space inefficient" compared to MySQL?
Date Tue, 25 May 2010 06:25:33 GMT
I think maybe one reason is that Cassandra will also log the operation
into log files, and the log contains the records.



2010/5/25 casablinca126.com <casablinca@126.com>:
> hi Sharan,
> what's the replication factor are you using ?
>
> regards,
> Cao Jiguang
>
>
> 2010-05-25
> ________________________________
> casablinca126.com
> ________________________________
> 发件人: sharanabasava raddi
> 发送时间: 2010-05-25  13:46:38
> 收件人: user@cassandra.apache.org
> 抄送:
> 主题: Why Cassandra is "space inefficient" compared to MySQL?
> Hi all,
> Am running "Cassandra" on Windows XP (single node) machine.
> I have made insertion of about "10 million" records into "Cassandra" , and
> it took around 90 minutes to insert and 8GB of space.
> For the same number of records MySQL will take "3 GB" space.
>
> Could you please tell me why?
> And please Give me the complete documentation for running Thrift API with
> Java to talk to Cassandra in "Red Hat Linux".
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
> Sharan
>
>
>



-- 
Best Regards

Jeff Zhang

Mime
View raw message