Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 99546 invoked from network); 12 Apr 2010 11:55:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 12 Apr 2010 11:55:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 10872 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 11:55:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 10857 invoked by uid 500); 12 Apr 2010 11:55:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 10849 invoked by uid 99); 12 Apr 2010 11:55:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:55:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.6 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vineetdaniel@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.172 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.172] (HELO mail-gy0-f172.google.com) (209.85.160.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 11:55:46 +0000 Received: by gyh4 with SMTP id 4so2891036gyh.31 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:55:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:received:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iF4YbadlS5ZgMTuvteTPQaaOE9J3bHKBLa+JWYsWOY4=; b=fi7M9dwAZpAWjivkvffn8+KdkCjnjnB4X5uj5sPNwdHwdLooLgrvfGiOytP2Wye8Kq 445YqsuHM5FrFAP99Ga65mQrtDyr0WbWEyQdzh9IZALpw3zt6kla5PxLnuHUKU9PBIIz hbjWRxzJJqiLZyX5fkR+tNkBpnIxL0Uv5TZUc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=OeCRGVgjl57VJFSaXmamlBoLo/EDao6fpX5ZgnQ0vEClLSjGQ6D1Epf11jbD8Ep/v3 l8eqiY79KRgdQ9HUlT7h89My/eSyhsG0vTVDEA+zZj8LYwZz7UUU7YjKfmHVUzYPIpsI WpTJ7TRy3b2aYwYz2v8Y6/VxSQGQ/5OEcmKrg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.189.10 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 17:25:25 +0530 Received: by 10.150.183.14 with SMTP id g14mr1525661ybf.343.1271073325865; Mon, 12 Apr 2010 04:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Subject: compare cassandra read n write results From: vineet daniel To: user@cassandra.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd6ed02125d8f048408d2ea --000e0cd6ed02125d8f048408d2ea Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hi A little while ago I tried cassandra's read n write operations and timed it. I am using Pandra for communication with cassandra. System is CentOS 5 with 2 GB RAM and dual core. I inserted 100000 rows in around 30 secs and read the same in 25 seconds. If anyone of you have run similar tests can you please share or tell whether this can be improved or not. I am using default configuration of cassandra and its a single node setup. Thanks Vineet Daniel --000e0cd6ed02125d8f048408d2ea Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi

A little while ago I tried cassandra's read n write operatio= ns and timed it.
I am using Pandra for communication with cassandra. Sy= stem is CentOS 5 with 2 GB RAM and dual core.

I inserted 100000 rows= in around 30 secs and read the same in 25 seconds.

If anyone of you have run similar tests can you please share or tell wh= ether this can be improved or not. I am using default configuration of cass= andra and its a single node setup.

Thanks
Vineet Daniel
--000e0cd6ed02125d8f048408d2ea--