Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 88024 invoked from network); 15 Apr 2010 23:53:30 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Apr 2010 23:53:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 66760 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:53:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cassandra-user-archive@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 66706 invoked by uid 500); 15 Apr 2010 23:53:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact user-help@cassandra.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: user@cassandra.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list user@cassandra.apache.org Received: (qmail 66698 invoked by uid 99); 15 Apr 2010 23:53:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:53:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=10.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.92.24] (HELO qw-out-2122.google.com) (74.125.92.24) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 23:53:23 +0000 Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 8so660730qwh.61 for ; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.73.135 with SMTP id q7mr964171qcj.41.1271375582411; Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:53:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [75.193.92.176] (176.sub-75-193-92.myvzw.com [75.193.92.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm1332875qyk.9.2010.04.15.16.53.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Lucandra or some way to query From: malsmith To: user@cassandra.apache.org In-Reply-To: References: <1271265373.32464.138.camel@erebus.lan> <1271297055411-4905149.post@n2.nabble.com> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=-siof8+STtcxR8i1D68R0" Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 19:52:58 -0400 Message-ID: <1271375578.11686.6.camel@malsmith-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 --=-siof8+STtcxR8i1D68R0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We looking into migrating from a replicated solr infrastructure to some form of clustered approach. Lucandra looks fantastic -- but this statement is troubling: "No normalizations are stored (no scoring)" from http://github.com/tjake/Lucandra When I use the demo/samples get do get a relevance score, can anyone describe (or give a scenario) when this limitation would become a problem? Thanks in advance. On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 05:16 +0000, Jake Luciani wrote: > Lucandra spreads the data randomly by index + field combination so you > do get "some" distribution for free. Otherwise you can use "nodetool > loadbalance" to alter the token ring to alleviate hotspots. > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:04 AM, HubertChang wrote: > > > If you worked with Lucandra in a dedicated searching-purposed > cluster, you > could balanced the data very well with some effort. > > >>I think Lucandra is really a great idea, but since it needs > order-preserving-partitioner, does that mean >>there may be > some 'hot-spot' > during searching? > > -- > View this message in context: > http://n2.nabble.com/Lucandra-or-some-way-to-query-tp4900727p4905149.html > Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list > archive at Nabble.com. > > --=-siof8+STtcxR8i1D68R0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit We looking into migrating from a replicated solr infrastructure to some form of clustered approach.  Lucandra looks fantastic -- but this statement is troubling:

"No normalizations are stored (no scoring)"  from http://github.com/tjake/Lucandra

When I use the demo/samples get do get a relevance score, can anyone describe (or give a scenario) when this limitation would become a problem?

Thanks in advance.

On Thu, 2010-04-15 at 05:16 +0000, Jake Luciani wrote:
Lucandra spreads the data randomly by index + field combination so you do get "some" distribution for free. Otherwise you can use "nodetool loadbalance" to alter the token ring to alleviate hotspots.

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 2:04 AM, HubertChang <huixiu@gmail.com> wrote:

If you worked with Lucandra in a dedicated searching-purposed cluster, you
could balanced the data very well with some effort.

>>I think Lucandra is really a great idea, but since it needs
order-preserving-partitioner, does that mean >>there may be some 'hot-spot'
during searching?

--
View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/Lucandra-or-some-way-to-query-tp4900727p4905149.html
Sent from the cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


--=-siof8+STtcxR8i1D68R0--