I *believe* that the key messages of those blog posts was:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 6:48 PM, Tatu Saloranta <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> I would think that there is also possibility of losing someLet me inject a couple useful references:
> increments, or perhaps getting duplicate increments?
> It is not just isolation but also correctness that is hard to maintain
> but correctness also. This can be more easily worked around in cases
> where there is additional data that can be used to resolve potentially
> ambiguous changes (like inferring which of shopping cart additions are
> real, which duplicates).
> With more work I am sure it is possible to get things mostly working,
> it's just question of cost/benefit for specific use cases.