incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Omer van der Horst Jansen <ome...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: get_range_slice(s) question
Date Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:55:54 GMT
Thank you! I hope to get around to testing your patches Thursday morning.

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> Since we've had some jira notification whackiness -- I just attached a
> v2 patch and commented.
>
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Omer van der Horst Jansen
> <omerhj@gmail.com> wrote:
>> The ticket is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-884
>>
>> I've attached a patch there that seems to fix the problem.
>>
>> Has anybody else seen this behavior?
>>
>>
>>> That would be a bug, not intended behavior.  Can you open a ticket?
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Omer van der Horst Jansen
>>> <ome...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> > I've noticed that both 0.5.1 and 0.6b2 return (ReplicationFactor)
>>> > identical copies of the data stored in my keyspace whenever I make a
>>> > call to get_range_slice or get_range_slices using
>>> > ConsistencyLevel.QUORUM.
>>> >
>>> > So with ReplicationFactor set to 2 for my application's KeySpace I get
>>> > double the number of KeySlices that I expect to get. When using
>>> > ConsistencyLevel.ONE I get only one KeySlice for each row.
>>> >
>>> > The same routine running against the Standard1 keyspace with a
>>> > ReplicationFactor of 1 returns only a single KeySlice for each row. A
>>> > ReplicationFactor of three gives me three identical KeySlices when using
>>> > ConsistencyLevel.QUORUM.
>>> >
>>> > Is this the intended behavior of get_range_slices? I remember reading in
>>> > one of the Dynamo papers that applications (and not Dynamo) are required
>>> > to sort out any discrepancies in the data, but in this case there aren't
>>> > any discrepancies.
>>> >
>>> > Omer
>>
>

Mime
View raw message