+1 for renaming the S Column/Column as a atomic operation :)
Regards,
</VJ>
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1 on adding a special case for this.
>
> 2010/3/18 Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com>:
> > I find it useful in one particular schema to have SuperColumns with
> > specific names and rename them sometimes. Rather than client-side
> > (read, write, delete) it would be nice if there was a SuperColumnRename
> > Mutation than encapsulated that sequence on the server side and perhaps
> > implemented it more efficiently. Right now I pay a pretty high cost for
> > the client roundtrips and this would make my writers much more
> > efficient. I don't need it to be atomic.
> >
> > Is this feasible and has it been discussed before?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ted
> >
> >
>
|