incubator-cassandra-user mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Greene <michael.gre...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: perfomance issue
Date Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:34:06 GMT
Thanks for the results.  Perhaps you could shed further light:Is this a
single node system?
Is the log level changed from DEBUG to INFO?
Are the commit log and data directories on the same drive?
Are the sets/gets being processed interleaved in parallel, or one then the
other?

Note that writes are ~6x and ~5x slower with those values, and gets are ~50x
and ~20x slower

Michael

On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Kirill A. Korinskiy <
catap+cassandra@catap.ru <catap%2Bcassandra@catap.ru>> wrote:

> Hello.
>
> I'm write a small erlang benchmark: cassandra vs simple fs storage and
> I have a results:
>
> fs_storage:
> 10: 1732/228633/2873/1128 992/233261/2870/1026
> 25: 4531/35290/6084/632 1786/35292/5969/312
> 50: 4707/311825/13694/4644 1366/382913/14470/5823
>
> cassandra:
> 10: 69014/424051/145871/28066 9553/427823/141925/29190
> 25: 165500/536108/339736/77173 14846/710370/341819/78694
> 50: 325790/1050753/667931/157962 9865/1033461/676317/160606
>
> legends:
> parallel request: get set min/max/avg/mad
>
> So. Cassandra slower ~50 times.
>
> Ok I change cassandra setting:
>
>  ColumnFamily from UTF8Type to BytesType
>  MemtableObjectCountInMillions from 0.1 to 1
>  ConcurrentReads from 8 to 64
>  ConcurrentWrites from 32 to 64
>
> And I have:
>
> fs_storage:
> 10: 2164/245375/2515/474 651/247790/2746/800
> 25: 5521/19959/5838/196 1836/20138/5943/186
> 50: 6369/32837/11476/944 1396/32818/11449/876
>
> cassandra:
> 10: 39931/279903/48463/4812 21378/278782/51477/4526
> 25: 101911/407343/119135/9158 8794/410423/123768/9076
> 50: 209202/429959/238179/12180 7803/442580/244402/13443
>
> Cassandra slower ~20 times.
>
> I's normal? Can I do something wrong? Maybe you have any ideas?
>
> --
> wbr, Kirill
>

Mime
View raw message