Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: (qmail 13195 invoked from network); 3 Aug 2009 17:48:33 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 3 Aug 2009 17:48:33 -0000 Received: (qmail 23158 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 17:48:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23135 invoked by uid 500); 3 Aug 2009 17:48:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 23126 invoked by uid 99); 3 Aug 2009 17:48:38 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:48:38 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jbellis@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.223 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.219.223] (HELO mail-ew0-f223.google.com) (209.85.219.223) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 17:48:29 +0000 Received: by ewy23 with SMTP id 23so3052056ewy.12 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:48:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UMtTaFKSI8o5Vo1K25rB6/Pjgm4Lcy/pCUk3jKqceo4=; b=dWrG4m0WQYvAb2Hb4c/csfpkoT1YGsvIcTjb8IQzhpSvJ7rzM+ft3uc9vH0zUAwrOw /RUxqpGDPnz5PlukTXl23yZEXZLfGsidG5PlU6Z0FP60VZTe7jkU9nk5z1iabqrYkUNZ tNwJ+L0FUhDoKcXV2Ib9Fo74c3W+uCy6WZ684= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=IMgKo03lVeWPNg/8HDZvrKu9LZ6bAumn9IerjZfoipTbSwvlJvNVT6vlET4tMe2ivx X3PuhxcNmHnjDdiHg/AvQU/fVxZloQ2LVexYFDXMEMa9naN2P9PvUQP+p3hD8B8kzmF4 2/0raH3saKcunhhHos6fVlGd+T0U8Yjrc4qwI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.53.133 with SMTP id g5mr1231330wec.160.1249321688953; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:48:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5676b0940908031043w6a8db212nf01b8771b35000c4@mail.gmail.com> References: <70cd74010908030823u4268c669pe70ea5797f64da8c@mail.gmail.com> <5676b0940908030959t2d8ae12fif24e73fe5102e882@mail.gmail.com> <18d0ed570908031010kb73eb2dtf1c017d1b1598d63@mail.gmail.com> <5676b0940908031012s1948e4b2lbb6155628ba8a9f0@mail.gmail.com> <5676b0940908031043w6a8db212nf01b8771b35000c4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:48:08 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: MVCC From: Jonathan Ellis To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It's not moderated (click the login link to get to a signup form). Changes are sent to the -commits list where anyone interested (like me :) can review them. -Jonathan P.S. sorry for the signup captcha questions -- someone apparently thought they were cute, but they typically take a bit of googling to answer. Not our fault! :) On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Mark McBride wrote= : > Cool. =A0There are a few things I've found out recently that should > probably go into the wiki (this, the fact that get_columns_since > silently returns no results if your column family isn't ordered by > time)... is it moderated at all? =A0Should I run changes by the mailing > list? > > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Jonathan Ellis wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Mark McBride wr= ote: >>> Thanks, that makes sense. =A0Is it an ok general rule that the >>> timestamps should be set to >>> >>> 1) The time that the data to be mutated was generated >>> 2) The current system time if the time the data was mutated isn't avail= able >> >> Yes. >> >>> Looking around at code it seems like time 0 is used a lot, which seems >>> pretty dangerous. >> >> We do this in test code to make it obviously clock-independent, yes. >> >> -Jonathan >> >