Return-Path: 
 <cassandra-user-return-255-apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: (qmail 29055 invoked from network); 17 Jul 2009 20:01:34 -0000
Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3)
  by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Jul 2009 20:01:34 -0000
Received: (qmail 57472 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 20:02:39 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cassandra-user-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57455 invoked by uid 500); 17 Jul 2009 20:02:39 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:cassandra-user-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cassandra-user-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <cassandra-user.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 57446 invoked by uid 99); 17 Jul 2009 20:02:39 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:02:39 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of vijay2win@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.210.191 as permitted sender)
Received: from [209.85.210.191] (HELO mail-yx0-f191.google.com)
 (209.85.210.191)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 17 Jul 2009 20:02:31 +0000
Received: by yxe29 with SMTP id 29so1712060yxe.32
        for <cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org>;
 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;
        bh=JaLub518UBzx8yD6UxiPQah8z/fk8HXhVTTPPlo6mgI=;
        b=xqHVp+BOeue0keaTKRb5WMrDltY6V94yNWUb8et8sPaDkcuVnD8Vv38UzKdz4bK4n9
         vVxqV/9OboGmFx7ejqB4Dg/ZZdq54BXj1HYqkxgsg0D5cJ8LnUH7n2r25pKQxsFuwuoN
         S2aE5PFbF8v+aq6JDjQPdpAqO+debqY7oePms=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        b=DMiQw+KjCsnBtZ5DBEPx3XlQ4RCJKCuu2IS3pXSpBrLsbmeBuLxYc/VBTcPW0q5WE+
         5y0sSI6B9kZc+Go0dzyLft35zPsmWCBjInUzWR6MXFr/kmCK69fgcE/MAKHd05mz83AB
         XR0YKU6+7waWE+ir8rpQbzAyQafWBuZ5qlzfI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.38.17 with SMTP id l17mr2122873anl.62.1247860931146; Fri,
	17 Jul 2009 13:02:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <e06563880907140726q58d75af9w78937dd2c917440b@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c1870d60907132314j65127b72nfc41c259a4630e37@mail.gmail.com>
	<ff1a07b80907140300i7ad9197u8a110ec446cc1836@mail.gmail.com>
	<op.uw135astd8okpy@audioslave>
 <ff1a07b80907140520j7d500224p8ddad5963bd15f1f@mail.gmail.com>
	<op.uw17jqs1d8okpy@audioslave>
 <ff1a07b80907140633n78c09d25o619f717dce3e41f1@mail.gmail.com>
	<e06563880907140716y4c475a62m9f5c0744fc50ade@mail.gmail.com>
	<ff1a07b80907140718i4d0085cfoc1669f348c201f41@mail.gmail.com>
	<e06563880907140726q58d75af9w78937dd2c917440b@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vijay <vijay2win@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:01:51 -0700
Message-ID: <9b40bc2a0907171301w4906deddu1ee217325a6ceff5@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Scaling from 1 to x (was: one server or more servers?)
To: cassandra-user@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e642d71087b732046eec438e
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--0016e642d71087b732046eec438e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

"since the write will fail if one of the target nodes is down"
I thought Hinted handoff will take care of this Right? Write will never fail
insted it will write to another node right?

correct me if i am wrong.

Thanks and Regards,
</VJ>




On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Jonathan Ellis <jbellis@gmail.com> wrote:

> N: guarantees consistent reads without having to wait for a quorum, so
> you trade write latency and availability (since the write will fail if
> one of the target nodes is down) for 100% consistency and reduced read
> latency
>

--0016e642d71087b732046eec438e
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

&quot;since the write will fail if one of the target nodes is down&quot; <b=
r>I thought Hinted handoff will take care of this Right? Write will never f=
ail insted it will write to another node right?<br><br>correct me if i am w=
rong.<br clear=3D"all">

<br>Thanks and Regards,<br>&lt;/VJ&gt;<br><br><br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 7:26 AM, Jonatha=
n Ellis <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:jbellis@gmail.com">jbellis@=
gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; p=
adding-left: 1ex;">

<div id=3D":259" class=3D"ii gt">N: guarantees consistent reads without hav=
ing to wait for a <span class=3D"il">quorum</span>, so<br>
you trade write latency and availability (since the write will fail if<br>
one of the target nodes is down) for 100% consistency and reduced read<br>
latency</div></blockquote></div><br>

--0016e642d71087b732046eec438e--