Thanks for the input. Sounds like pooling or thread locals is the way to go.


On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:57 PM, Jonathan Ellis <> wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:13 PM, Ian Holsman<> wrote:
> ugh.
> if this is a byproduct of thrift

it is.

> we should have another way of getting to
> the backend.
> serialization is *not* a desired feature for most people ;-0

maybe not, but that's how every single database client works that I
can think of, so it shouldn't exactly be surprising.

you want multiple commands executing in parallel, you open multiple
connections.  not a Big Deal imo.